Saturday, May 23, 2026

Le Havre Syllabus (Case Studies)

Case Studies:

These are case studies we will use in class. You are not responsible for all of them; we will assign case studies in our first class meeting. The case studies will be the subject of your motions arguments and settlement negotiations.

  • CASE ONE: Royall v. Dicks (Md.) (per se)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE TWO: Carter v. Jones (Wash.) (fact-opinion)
        Dropbox   Google   (Mary Jones at Medium)
  • CASE THREE: Andes Roofing v. Rusnak (Ky.) (fact-opinion)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE FOUR: Davenport Extreme Pools v. Mulfur (Ky.) (fact-opinion)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE FIVE: Andrews v. At World Properties (Ill.) (truth-falsity)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE SIX: Flickinger v. King (Ala.) (truth-falsity/CDM)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE SEVEN: Fells v. Service Employees Int’l Union (D.C.) (truth-falsity/implication)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE EIGHT: Gibson Bros. v. Oberlin College (Ohio) (fact-opinion)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE NINE: Michel v. New York Post (11th Cir. (N.Y. law)) (truth-falsity)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE TEN: Berisha v. Lawson (S.D. Fla. (Fla. law)) (private-public figure)
        Dropbox   Google
  • CASE ELEVEN: Evans v. Amazon.com (E.D. Wis. (Wis. Law))
    (invasion of privacy by disclosure: private facts, HORP, legitimate public interest) 
        Dropbox   Google    (Amazon video at TMZ)